Hollywood Scanner Blog

Kelly Brook is arguably one of the most fuckable women around. She’s got that womanly figure that looks good in and out of clothes. She looks awesome in a bikini. And she’s got a sweet yet slightly naughty face perfect for looking up at you while she gives you a blowjob. She’s been a staple of the British tabloids for quite some time and despite the fact that those papers do their best to find something cheap and trashy to write about her, they never seem to succeed since she carries herself in a classy manner. In a bikini frolicking on the beach, or attending a red carpet event dressed to the nines, or even in sweats in candid workout pics, you look at her and never think for one second this girl is cheap. Then… I saw these pics.

Taken in 2000 for the London premiere of the Guy Ritchie film Snatch, Kelly dressed like a two-dollar prostitute who got a gift certificate for a Bob Mackie gown and chose the skankiest outfit usually worn only during the ice skating event at the winter Olympics. Why on earth would she wear an outfit like this? Sure she’s got an awesome form and likes to show it off, but why would anyone in their right mind wear something like this deliberately. I almost feel like Kelly lost a bet or something and had to wear this fugly creation.

Granted this was 9 years ago, and her reputation of being a classy fashionista perhaps was years away. Maybe she took one look at these shots when they first came out and said “Oh my God, I look fucking ridiculous!!” and hence, the fashionista was born out of embarassment. So I guess it was a good thing that she wore this outfit and realized how bad she looked. See, everything happens for a reason - even really bad fashion choices. Hollywood is rife with those, and you can see them all here, along with celebrities caught in embarassing situations that almost never requires clothing.

Okay, even I’ve got to admit that Kim Kardashian’s looking pretty sizzling in these shots from her upcoming 2009 calendar.  She’s wearing delicious lingerie and showing off her bosomy assets, which is confusing, because doesn’t she know she’s known for her ass?  Her cleavage is mouthwatering in these pictures, though, and you almost forget that the only reason you follow reports about Kim Kardashian is for views of her sweet cushion that’s meant for some hard n’ fast pushin’.  Those ripe mammaries though, are looking mighty fine, so there’s no need to complain about getting served some breast meat instead of huge chunks of booty blubber.

What’s really mystifying about some of these calendar photos is how some of them are close-ups of Kim Kardashian.  Now who wants to look at Kim Kardashian’s face without seeing any of her cleavage or her ripe rear end?  Duh, no one, of course!  If I wanted to look at some girl’s a face on my calendar, I’d pick someone like Miranda Kerr, although any calendar hiding her body, or any cutie’s bod for that matter, probably has a gay art director.  So, with this offering we’ve got a calendar that men would only want to look at around half of the year, congrats Kim!

If you’d rather see Kim Kardashian’s smokin' hot bod rather than her face, and in naughty amorous action too (you know what I mean *cough* amateur sex video *cough*), then just check out this site instead of that calendar this New Year!